Nozick, Locke, and Zimbabwe

Long before Nozick published his seminal critique of Rawlsian distribution, John Locke laid out general rules for how property could be passed from being simply a part of nature to being owned by an individual. His proviso (named so by Nozick much later, and really a part of the Second Treatise)  states that individuals must leave “enough and as good in common” for others when acquiring natural resources, such as land.

Nozick adds that when a person mixes his own resources, such as labor, into a natural resource, a conversion of public, natural property turns in private property in the process. This conversion forms the basis of Nozick’s initial acquisition theory, a first step in his justice by just steps basis for the Entitlement State in Anarchy, State and Utopia.

A 2010 article about land “reform” in Zimbabwe reminded me of Nozick’s writing on the subject: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8617684.stm

Nozick is sometimes criticized for the practicality of his ideas, particularity the enforceability of the Lockean Proviso. How far back should the state go to enforce ownership rights accruing to the “original” peoples who mixed their labor with land? What if the results are disastrous?

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Distribution and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 14 + 7 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)